Standards
Audit-ready by construction
General Autonomy structures its outputs to map directly onto the work products your assessors expect. Evidence is not bolted on at the end; it is a byproduct of the workflow.
ISO 26262
Functional Safety
The road-vehicle functional safety standard. Supports HARA, ASIL determination, safety goals, functional and technical safety requirements, and the safety case.
ISO/PAS 21448
SOTIF
Safety of the Intended Functionality. Addresses hazards from functional insufficiency and foreseeable misuse, including unknown scenarios and operational-domain coverage.
ISO/SAE 21434
Automotive Cybersecurity
Road-vehicle cybersecurity engineering. Supports TARA, threat modeling, attack-path analysis, and cybersecurity goals and requirements.
UL 4600
Autonomous Products
Standard for the safety evaluation of autonomous products. Emphasizes the safety case, argumentation, and evidence for systems without a human driver.
IEEE
IEEE Guidance
Relevant IEEE guidance for autonomous and AI-enabled systems, complementing the safety and cybersecurity standards above.
Need another framework?
We regularly extend coverage as programs and regulations evolve. Ask about your specific requirements.
Ask usCoverage matrix
How the platform maps to each standard
Which product supports which work products. Deep integration; not a checkbox.
| Standard | Key work products | Primary product |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 26262 | HARA, ASIL determination, safety goals, FSR/TSR, FMEA, FTA, safety case | G-Assess |
| ISO/PAS 21448 (SOTIF) | Triggering-condition analysis, scenario coverage, unknown-scenario reduction, validation | G-Assess · G-Sim · G-Data |
| ISO/SAE 21434 | Item definition, TARA, attack paths, cybersecurity goals and requirements | G-Assess |
| UL 4600 | Safety case, argument and evidence, operational-domain coverage, field monitoring inputs | G-Assess · G-Data |
| IEEE guidance | Assurance considerations for AI-enabled and autonomous systems | G-Assess |
Mapping is indicative. We will walk through exact work-product support for your program during a demo.
Assurance you can defend
Traceability is the thread through every standard
Each of these standards ultimately asks the same question: can you show the argument, and the evidence behind it? General Autonomy keeps hazards, requirements, scenarios, tests, and results linked, so the answer is always yes, and always current.
- One traceability model spanning safety and cybersecurity
- Change-impact analysis when requirements move
- Export to the formats assessors and regulators expect
- A defensible audit trail for every safety decision
Map the platform to your compliance obligations
Tell us which standards govern your program. We will show you exactly which work products General Autonomy produces.