Solutions
Safety engineering, re-engineered for AI-driven autonomy
Every workflow that stands between your system and certification, accelerated by AI and kept traceable, reviewable, and standards-aligned. Explore the analyses General Autonomy modernizes across the safety lifecycle.
One connected thread from hazard to certification. Change a requirement and the impact propagates across the lifecycle.
Verification & Validation
Prove the system does what the requirements demand
Plan, execute, and track Verification and Validation (V&V) against requirements without losing the thread between what you tested and what you claimed. General Autonomy links every test to its requirement and its evidence, so gaps surface early instead of during audit.
- Requirements-driven test planning and prioritization
- Automated linkage between requirements, tests, and results
- Coverage tracking across the operational design domain
- Reduced rework from change-impact analysis
- Outcome: lower V&V effort per requirement
- Outcome: fewer late-stage coverage surprises
- Outcome: defensible, audit-ready test evidence
Hazard Analysis
Systematic hazard discovery, drafted in hours
Run Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment (HARA), System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), and Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in one environment. AI drafts the tedious first pass, from control structures to unsafe control actions, and your engineers refine and approve.
- Guided HARA with severity, exposure, and controllability
- STPA control structures and unsafe control action analysis
- Fault trees and FMEA worksheets generated from system models
- Automatic safety-goal and ASIL assignment proposals
Cybersecurity Analysis
Threat analysis that keeps pace with connected autonomy
Perform Threat Analysis and Risk Assessment (TARA) alongside your safety work, not in a separate silo. Identify assets, damage scenarios, and threat paths, then rate risk and derive cybersecurity goals aligned with ISO/SAE 21434.
- Asset identification and damage-scenario modeling
- Attack-path analysis and feasibility rating
- Cybersecurity goals and controls traceable to threats
- Shared model with functional safety analyses
- Outcome: unified safety and security view of the system
- Outcome: faster TARA iteration on design changes
- Outcome: ISO 21434 work products ready for audit
Scenario Generation
Find the edge cases before the field does
Generate risk-driven scenarios directly from your hazard models and operational design domain. Rather than sampling randomly, General Autonomy targets the conditions most likely to expose unsafe behavior, then measures how much of the domain your testing actually covers.
- Risk-driven and rare-event scenario generation
- Parameterized variation across the operational domain
- Edge-case discovery guided by hazard analysis
- Coverage analytics that quantify residual gaps
Digital-Twin Evaluation
Validate behavior at scale before it reaches hardware
Orchestrate large simulation campaigns against high-fidelity digital twins, then analyze results for regressions, safety violations, and coverage. Move the majority of validation left, and reserve physical testing for what truly requires it.
- Simulation orchestration across scenario libraries
- Automated pass, fail, and safety-violation detection
- Regression tracking across software releases
- Scenario analytics that prioritize the next test
- Outcome: more validation coverage per engineering hour
- Outcome: earlier detection of safety regressions
- Outcome: reduced dependence on costly field testing
Safety Case & Traceability
Assemble the argument, not just the artifacts
Build a structured, auditable safety case where every claim is backed by evidence and every requirement traces to a hazard and a test. When the system changes, the safety case shows you exactly what needs revisiting.
- Structured safety-case documentation and argumentation
- Bidirectional traceability from hazard to evidence
- Change-impact analysis across the lifecycle
- Export to the formats your assessors expect
Why it matters
Outcomes your program is measured on
Reduce V&V effort
Automate the repetitive drafting and bookkeeping that consumes safety engineering hours.
Accelerate certification
Produce standards-aligned work products that are audit-ready by construction.
Increase coverage
Generate and measure scenario coverage across the operational domain.
Improve hazard discovery
Surface unsafe control actions and edge cases traditional methods miss.
Improve traceability
Keep hazards, requirements, tests, and evidence linked end to end.
Reduce engineering cost
Do more assessment with the team you have, without lowering the bar.
Map these workflows to your program
Tell us your standards, systems, and timeline. We will show you exactly where General Autonomy accelerates your safety engineering.